|
 Philip
Campbell
(Nature, UK) gives a starting point for the debate on social implications
of nanotechnology
Nanotech, uncertainty
and the publics (June 2003)
Douglas Parr
(Greenpeace, UK) on
nanotech,
funding and science policy
(Nov 2003)
Philippe
Busquin (EU) about
his services' activities and interest in nanotechnology
(Feb 2004)
Fiona Fox (Science
Media Centre, UK) on
communicating nanotechnology
- a guideline for scientists (Mar 2004)
Alfred Nordmann
(University of Darmstadt, Germany) regards
nanotech as a diversity
of technologies (Apr 2004)
We want to
discuss in four sessions
Nanotech
and Size
"There is plenty of room at the
bottom" |
Nanotech
and Man
"Where nanotech hits the human
body" |
Nanotech
and Culture
"How nanotech changes our mind" |
Nanotech
and Power
"Who are the winners?" |
The debate
is organised by Tobias Beck
and Martin Schäfer.
|
|
Invited
for a contribution to the debate, or for adding own features
are:
Gabriel
Aeppli, UCL, UK
Philippe Busquin,
EU
Philip
Campbell, Nature, UK
Cees Dekker, Delft University, Netherlands
Fiona
Fox, Science Media Centre, London, UK
Wolfgang Heckl, University of Munich, Germany
Heinrich Kurz, RWTH Aachen, Germany
Justin Molloy, York University, UK
Alfred
Nordmann, TU Darmstadt, Germany
Douglas
Parr, Greenpeace, UK
Yves Petroff, France
Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Strasbourg University, France
Renzo Tomellini, EU
Mark Welland, Cambridge University, UK
Declined
Sony Europe
|
Science writers in Europe may present their own debate forums. Please
contact us.
|
|
