This week in European sciences -- week 39 |
Overview
|
>> former issues | ||
|
|||
Scientists
agree there is no fair and objective way to measure the value of science
- and compare, for instance, the work of researchers. The science citation
index makes a try. The Guardian (September
25, 2003) numbers the first 25 most cited champions in science. And
Ian Sample reports the limitations of the measure: Almost all work is
done in life sciences. Not a single physicist makes the list. Almost all
are male and American. Only three women and nine from outside the US are
on the list. To give an impression by numbers: World champion is Bert
Vogelstein of John Hopkins University, US, working in molecular biology
with 106,401 citations (361 papers) in the last 20 years. |
|
The
Guardian September 25, 2003 |
|
In the German
weekly Die Zeit (September
25, 2003) Sabine Etzold is discussing the influence of the "abilitity
to forget" on the quality of the brain. In the times of Sigmund Freud
the main opinion was: Remember or your silent memories are going to catch
you. Nowadays, the importance of deliberate forget is getting more and
more a topic of psychological research. Although the reason for this mechanism
of our brain is getting clearer - kicking the trash out of your memory
- the function is still unclear. Some empirical tests show, that people
who know how to forget something unimportant are able to learn new things
better and faster. And the reason why old people learn things worse than
young people might be related to that. The older you are, the worse you
can forget. But like in every field of neuroscience: the real knowledge
is scanty and there is plenty of room for interpretation. |
|
Die
Zeit September 25, 2003 |
|
Drop That Harpoon! Whale Hostilities Revisited Washington
is reviewing the possibility of sanctions against Iceland, even though
the Northern European island is not breaking any laws because it is killing
whales for scientific research. "We believe the necessary scientific
data can be gathered by well-established non-lethal means," Rolland
Schmitten, US commissioner to the International Whaling Commission, is
being quoted in The New York Times (September
25, 2003). The article by Lizette Alvarez, also published in the Reykjavik
Journal, reports that after 14 years of not hunting whales, Iceland has
killed its first minke whale as part of a scientific research program.
The program falls outside the 1986 ban on commercial whaling. Iceland's
Marine Research Institute wants to analyze the stomach content of 38 minke
whales by the end of 2003 to see how much fish a minke whale eats on average.
Chances of the Washington office to push sanctions against Iceland are
limited. |
|
New
York Times September 25, 2003 |
|
Cancer Drug Extends Life by a Few Months Experts presented
the findings of how two different breast cancer drugs affect the treatment
of women with incurable breast cancer at a European cancer conference
in Copenhagen, Denmark. The Wall Street Journal has picked up a report
by the Associated Press (September
25, 2003) and reports that the study compared the effectiveness of
American-produced Taxol and European-developed Taxotere. Women taking
Taxotere suffered from more side effects but survived an average of 15.4
months compared to Taxol-receipients who lived for an average of 12.7
months. The study was funded by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., the US company
of Franco-German drug company Aventis SA. Aventis produces Taxotere. In
a related-article also published in The Wall Street Journal (Experimental
Drug for Cancer Found Less Toxic than Taxol, September 24, 2003), David
P. Hamilton reports that "American Pharmaceutical Partners Inc. said
its experimental cancer drug Abraxane, a re-engineered form of the common
chemotherapy drug Taxol, was significantly less toxic and more effective
than Taxol itself in the late-stage human tests." However, American
Pharmaceutical has yet to release the data to prove its claim. Hamilton
writes that several companies are currently racing to modify traditional
chemotherapy drugs. Among those companies are Seattle-based Cell Therapeutics,
Inc. and NeoPharm Inc. of Lake Forst, Illinois. |
|
Wall
Street Journal September 25, 2003 |
|
The Schön Case: No Manipulation Seen at Konstanz The final report of a commission at University of Konstanz, Germany, installed to examine the recent case of scientific fraud by physicist Jan Hendrik Schön states that there is no evidence that Schön manipulated data in his working period at Konstanz. According to Frank van Bebber writing in Süddeutsche Zeitung (September 24, 2003) Dr Schön altered data, gave misleading interpretation and smoothed data plots. But no deliberate manipulation was seen by the commission. For instance in experimental sciences it's not unusual to smooth data to make results clearer, says the commission. About a year ago Dr Schön was dismissed from his work at the Bell Labs, USA, after an examination uncovered 16 cases of scientific fraud. Several papers in high-ranked journals have been withdrawn. Before working at Bell Labs Dr Schön received his PhD from Konstanz. The Smog in Your Room According
to a EU-backed study the air inside your house might have a higher level
of benzene, toluene or xylene concentration as the surroundings. Wiebke
Rögener reports in Süddeutsche Zeitung (September
24, 2003) about the findings by the EU Joint Research Center (JSC)
based in Ispra, Italy. The volatile compounds are under consideration
causing diseases as the sick building syndrom or cancer. A flat in Antwerpen
had a 1.5-fold higher concentration with benzene as outdoors. In Basel,
the record is 2.3-fold. In addition the researchers attached passive samplers
to some people measuring the round-the-clock exposure to the compounds.
It's not clear where the substances come out. Hence, JSC is going to investigate
with further studies how the stuff in your room evapourates the chemical
compounds. Up to now there is no regulation for manufacturers to indicate
substances used for their products. |
|
Süddeutsche
Zeitung September 24, 2003 |
|
Not Science Fiction: An Elevator to Space The Los Alamos
National Laboratory sponsored a conference for scientists to explore the
concept of building a 100,000 kilometer high elevator that could carry
cargo into space. Advances toward ultrastrong fibers make the concept
a possibility, Kenneth Chang reports in The New York Times (September
23, 2003). One step towards reality of the concept was the discovery
of nanotubes in 1991. Nanotubes are "cylindrical molecules of carbon
with many times the strength of steel," Chang writes. Proponents
argue such an elevator would eventually lower the cost of placing a satellite
into space form $10,000 a pound to $100. "As soon as we can build
it, we should build it," Dr. Bryan E. Laubsher, scientist at Los
Alamos and organizer of the conference, said. The cost estimated to build
the first elevator is about $6.2 billion. In comparison, it will cost
more than $100 billion to finish and operate the International Space Station.
But researchers agree that the development of such a project would still
take years. |
|
New
York Times September 23, 2003 |
|
German Intelligence Undermines Jap Jap is a
piece of software that prevents tracking of surfers on the Web. But unlike
other services like Anonymizer or Rewebber (who know their clients) people
using Jap are even unknown there, as Steffen Winter reports in Der Spiegel
(September
22, 2003). Developed at the University of Dresden, Germany, and funded
by the German Ministry of Economics the Jap software (Java Anon Proxy)
should have been a masterpiece in consumer protection. But German intelligence
thinks different: the software seems to be an obstacle tracking criminals
on the Internet. After several court decisions one Jap server recently
moved to New York. |
|
Der
Spiegel September 22, 2003 |
|
While one
country after the other experiences gigantic blackouts, from this week
on some thirty households in Northern Norway will have no more electricity
problems, reports the Repubblica (September
20, 2003). A new kind of hydroelectric power plant, completely immersed
in the Kvalsund canal, will take advantage of the natural tides and produce
an estimated 700,000 kWh per year. At four cents per kWh, electricity
from the Hammerfest plant will be three times as expensive as conventional
hydroelectricity, but it will also be more environmentally friendly -
the turbines are quiet and do not disturb animal habitats. |
|
La
Repubblica September 20, 2003 |
Feedback |
We are glad to receive your comments! Send us an e-mail |