EuroScience.Net newsletter - this week in European sciences - www.euroscience.net

 

 

Adolescence with H.I.V.

New York Times 26.6.2005

With ever better treatment of H.I.V. and Aids children born with the virus now get into their adolescence. Jonathan Dee reports in the NY Times magazine (26.6.2005) about the emerging challenges of doctors and psychologist treating this new class of patients: "Children born with the virus also aren't born with the knowledge that they carry it; this was a nonissue when few survived infancy, but as their prognosis improved, the whole issue of disclosure - of what they know about their own disease, and who tells them, and when, and how - began to reveal its intricacies."

Today, "women who have been H.I.V.-positive for a decade or more can, with early and consistent drug treatment, bear children with very little risk of transmitting the disease. The transmission rate is now 1 percent to 2 percent, which translates to about 200 H.I.V.-infected infants born each year" in the U.S., notes Dee.

 

 

Without a Cause: Parents Campaign Against Science

New York Times 25.6.2005

A bitter battle is going on in the U.S. between parents with autistic children and, well, science. Gardiner Harris and Anahad O'Connor report in the NY Times (25.6.2005) about the issue. Parents suppose a preservative compound in vaccines, called thimerosal which contains mercury, as a cause for autism. Five scientific studies from the U.S., Britain, Denmark and Sweden didn't show up a link. The parents insist of their view now backed by eminent politicians.

On the other hand "the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the Institute of Medicine, the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics have all largely dismissed the notion that thimerosal causes or contributes to autism," write the authors. However, the parents' interest groups grows and campaigns to ban the compound against the scientific evidence.

Scientist say that the amount of mercury as a preservation in vaccines is not more than the daily intake by breast milk. But "most scientists believe that the illness is influenced strongly by genetics but that some unknown environmental factor may also play a role," write the authors, adding that every worried parent has his or her theory, be it cell phones, ultrasound or diets. Especially for mercury, science discards a possibly cause.

The investigation by the authors also revealed that the campaigning parents rely on testifying persons more likely quacks than proper scientists. "It doesn't seem to matter what the studies and the data show," a health official says, "And that's really scary for us because if science doesn't count, how do we make decisions? How do we communicate with parents?"

 

 

Heat - How Global Warming is Changing the World

The Guardian 30.6.2005

In a supplement the Guardian (30.6.2005) reports on all facets of global warming, including regional temperature shifts, melting glaciers, health effects of scorching summers, China's economic growth effect on the environment, transport and traffic, what we can do, and more.

 

 

Chimeras with us

New Scientist 25.6.2005

Sounds like science fiction, but is actually true for the uninitiated: Scientist mix animal and human cells for better human health. In real life chimeric creatures are commonplace like mice with human immune systems, kidneys or skin, writes Jamie Shreeve in New Scientist (25.6.2005). But get one step further and modify a mouse with 10 percent of its brain replaced by human cells, or even more. When does the mouse starts to behave like a human? Actually scientists don't expect that, but nobody knows exactly. Shreeve delves into the moral minefield.

 

 

Mystery of Time

New York Times 28.6.2005

Dennis Overbye in the NY Times (28.6.2005) about time travel, the arrow of time and causality. Travels in time, however, give many logical problems, for instance, regarding your own identity when there're two of you around. Physicists claim that the laws of physics don't prohibit time traveling, but most think it's not feasible due to technical reasons. You would need wormholes or more fantastic cosmological arrangements to make it. But it's all interesting as an experiment of thought.

 

 

45 Health Projects Get $437 Million

New York Times 28.6.2005

To tackle the greatest health threats in poor countries, the William and Melinda Gates Foundation spends 437 Million dollars for 43 projects, writes Donald McNeil in the NY Times (28.6.2005). The projects are said to be "very visionary" and high in risk, hence, the success isn't guaranteed but the prospects are worth the investments. "The foundation, which in just a few years has become one of the driving forces in global health, has in the past given grants of $1.5 billion to help existing vaccines reach more of the world's children, $150 million to find a malaria vaccine, $127 million to find an AIDS vaccine and $200 million to stop the spread of AIDS in India," writes McNeil.

 

 

A Case of Transparency vs. Obscurity

New York Times 29.6.2005

A bioterrorist attack to the American milk supply was described by Stanford mathematician Lawrence Wein in a paper submitted to a journal of the National Academy of Sciences, but first put on hold. Governmental officials demanded not to publish the paper, writes Scott Shane in the NY Times (29.6.2005), because it could terrorists hints on weak points of societal security. After evaluating pro and con of a release, the Academy decided for transparency: The information might be used for concrete steps to safeguard the milk supply.
Erika Check explains the issue at Nature online (29.6.2005). "In a free society, the notion that we become more secure through transparency is important," a scientist is quoted. The issue is also seen as a test case on forthcoming dual-use research evaluations by the government and the scientific community.

 

 

Fusion Reactor ITER to be Build in France

Nature online 28.6.2005

The next experimental fusion reactor ITER will be build in France, according to a governmental agreement between the European Union, especially France, and Japan. Duclan Butler and Geoff Brumfiel stress at Nature online (28.6.2005) the key advantages of the prospected fusion reactor to present nuclear power stations: "Unlike fission plants, a fusion reactor would not be vulnerable to meltdowns and its fuel could not be turned into nuclear bombs. Perhaps the biggest attraction of fusion is that the waste from a plant would only be radioactive for about a hundred years, rather than for hundreds of thousands of years." A major goal for ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) is the demonstration that power output exceeds input. This achieved a prototype reactor DEMO is scheduled for a decade or two later. Now all governments involved have to sign the agreement.
David Adams adds in the Guardian (28.6.2005) the next challenges. First the procedure: "Some problems remain. The US cannot ratify any agreement until Congress looks at complaints from domestic energy researchers that their grants have been slashed to pay the US contribution." Second technically the pro and con: "Supporters claim such fusion reactors could produce enough electricity to solve the world's energy demands and, because they would not release carbon dioxide, the problem of global warming. Critics argue that the science is unproven, and say that the promise of nuclear fusion has been 30 years away since the 1960s. ITER will show who is right."

 

 

Hitch Hiking Invaders

Spiegel online 27.6.2005

Scientists warn of invading species that may turn into pests for agriculture or the landscape. Chris Löwer reports in Spiegel online (27.6.2005) about a funny path: seed that do a hitch and travel by car from region to region. Researchers at Technical University Berlin collected dust and seeds along German roads and thus tried to track the spread of the invaders. They collected the seeds in road tunnels where they are unlikely to get deposited by birds or by wind. Interestingly the researchers also found salt water weeds along the road due to winter de-icing salts.

According to the common understanding of the protection of bio-diversity invading species have to be controlled or combated,
writes Diemut Klärner in FAZ (28.6.2005). In Germany roughly some 1000 invading plants and animals are known, but only 30 have met a blacklist and put endemic organisms in danger.

 

 

Google's Opinions

New Scientist 25.6.2005

Search engine results are under attack by spammers: They try to boost websites with pornographic content or shopping sites to the first ten ranks of the Google results lists. Celeste Biever reports in New Scientist (25.6.2005) on the methods used. However, the battle between search engines and optimizers is as old as search engines exist. On the one side there're marketing companies, 'whitehats', that legally optimize the code of a website for easy access by the search bots. On the other side, 'blackhats' cloak websites (showing the search engines a different site as the general user) or install link farms to cheat the search algorithms. Those algorithms are kept secret by Google & Co. and are legally considered as opinions. Hence, nobody can suit the search engine companies for falling off from rank 10 to 1000 after a revision of the algorithm.

 

 

Galileo on its Way

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 26.6.2005

Thomas Heeg bring in FAZ on Sunday (26.6.2005) an update on the scheduled Galileo satellite navigation system. This week will see the decision on the 'Galileo joint untertaking', the project managing consortium. Now the two bidding organisations, Inavsat and Eurely, submitted a joint proposal for the contract, obviously due to political reasons: The German minster of traffic groaned that sufficient money has to become redirected to Germany that contributes 20 percent of Galileo's budget and is only present in the Eurely organisation. Heeg also writes that so-called killer applications for the paid-for services of Galileo are still needed.

 

 

Pebbles Tell Their Stories

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 19.6.2005

Ulf von Rauchhaupt writes in FAZ on Sunday (16.6.2005) a nice piece on pebbles. Boring stuff? No! While children know too little about the pebbles to find them boring, scientists know to much to put them aside: Every pebble tells a story.

 

 

Rescue Vessels for High Buildings

The Economist 23.6.2005

Think of an umbrella, turn it upside-down, throw it out of a window, and, well, take your seat: That's the principle of an inflatable escape pod from tall buildings in case of an emergency like fire. Parachutes won't work because they may not open properly, but the operational principle of the escape pod, now demonstrated at the Paris air show by a Russian company, seems worth considering, writes the Economist (23.6.2005).
Also interesting and well-explained a piece on unraveling the signature of neutrinos in the 'visible' universe just one or two seconds after the big bang. "In the time that it takes you to read this article, around 10 million billion of them will have passed directly through your body without causing any effect," explains the Economist the interaction of neutrinos with matter and you.

 

 

Weapons, from Farms to Labs

Science magazine 24.6.2005

Robin Coupland and Kobi-Renée Leins write in an editorial for Science magazine (24.6.2005) about the Geneva Protocol that prohibits the bacteriological and chemical warfare. A conference on the Biological Weapons Convention is scheduled this month in Geneva. The authors are concern whether recent major advances in chemistry, microbiology or nuclear physics may be used in weapons programmes. They address the awareness and responsibility of scientists for their work: "They should make any effort to ensure that the outcome of their research serves only to advance humanity." Treaties like the 1925 Geneva Protocol have a deep resonance in human morality, history and psychology as for similar prohibitions of poisoning were also known from the Greeks and Romans, or Saracens.
The failed summit of European leaders on the EU's budget including 73 billion euros for the period 2007-2013 is reviewed by Martin Enserink. Because a compromise paper suggested 43 billion euros but was eventually discarded it is thought that no future budget for the FP7 research framework programme will comprise more money. Now, science policy makers argue where to cut programmes and schemes. The European Research Council (annual budget: 1,7 billion euros)? That's possible because it hasn't started yet. Others are more optimistic: From July to December the U.K. runs the European Council's presidency, and always is a big promoter of science, education and innovation, as well as turning farms into labs.

 

 

GM Crops in China

Financial Times 24.6.2005

"China has quietly established itself as a capable competitor in GM crops," writes Geoff Dyer in the FT (24.6.2005). The Chinese government regards GM crops as important for future agriculture, for food safety and farmer's income. The technology is aggressively pushed, says an official with the Center of Chinese Agricultural Policy. Dyer describes the GMO controversy from a Western point of view: generally you attach the opponents Monsanto and Greenpeace as key stakeholders in the issue. Now China threatens both: the country will support its own companies, also the argument of Greenpeace 'GMO are a tool of transnational corporate interests' goes wrong.

At present, 65 percent of Chinese cotton is GMO. "the [GM] cotton has raised yields among Chinese farmers by 9 per cent and has contributed to an 80 per cent reduction in pesticide use," writes Dyer. Market shares are estimated 60 percent for Chinese companies and 40 percent for Monsanto.

GM soya isn't approved in China because the field is dominated by Monsanto. Also the Chinese government hoped to sell non-GM soya to Europe at a higher price.

Next may come GM rice. Some varieties are tested successfully, but opponents like Greenpeace fight hard to prevent approval. "China has developed three separate types of GM rice, each of which has undergone trials around the country. One of the varieties is based on the Bt gene used in cotton, while the others contain genes to make the crop resistant to diseases or herbicides," writes Dyer.

 

 

Machines with a Virtual Self

The Guardian 23.6.2005

Igor Aleksander, retired professor of electrical engineering at Imperial College London, attempts to bring consciousness in a machine. Alok Jha profiles the Croatian-born researcher in the Guardian (23.6.2005). Don't mix Aleksander's approach with artificial intelligence. A term he doesn't like because artificial systems, say machines, perform very, very simple things. Consciousness consists out of five features, according to Aleksander: "a sense of self, imagination, focused attention, forward planning ad emotion." Well, if scientists were to find bees with all those features, "then you can safely say that that organism is conscious." His team at Imperial College is now trying to implement these axioms of consciousness into virtual machines. However, there're more questions than answers.

 

 

Natural Counting

The Guardian 20.6.2005

Ben Goldacre tells in the Guardian (20.6.2005) why we should count in natural frequencies. That's the best way to make people understand probabilities, risks and the outcomes of scientific studies, adding "So if anyone is listening, this is the information I want from a newspaper, to help me make decisions about my health: I want to know who you're talking about (eg men in their 50s); I want to know what the baseline risk is (eg four out of 100 will have a heart attack over 10 years); and I want to know what the increase in risk is, as a natural frequency (two extra men out of that 100 will have a heart attack over 10 years); and I want to know exactly what's causing that increase in risk - an occasional headache pill or daily pain relief for arthritis. Health journalists are perfectly well paid, and the ones I know get paid more than the NHS pays me; it's not too much to ask."
In a
Letter to the Guardian (23.6.2005), Richard Horton of The Lancet adds one point to understand risks: the reliability of evidence provided by the study.

 

 

---

Subscribe | Unsubscribe | Feedback

(c) EuroScience.Net 2005 -- at http://www.euroscience.net